ACC strength of schedule rankings 2020: Georgia Tech, Florida State facing daunting slates


Who you play each season matters in college football. It’s always been the case, but in the age of the College Football Playoff, it matters even more. While winning your conference is as simple as having a better record against your conference opponents than everybody else within it, it’s not enough to get you to the playoff.

To reach the playoff, you have to be deemed one of the four best teams in the country by a select group of individuals, a group that might have stats and metrics available to them as tools to make decisions, though they remain humans nonetheless.

You have to impress them. You have to beat Somebody. You can’t lose to Nobody.

With that in mind, I’ve spent the last few springs trying to determine which teams in the country are likely to face the most difficult schedules in the upcoming seasons. It’s not an overly complicated process, but I’ll explain how it works.

Methodology: I rank all 130 teams using use a statistical model that judges teams based on their performances in games. My opinion plays no role in it. History often gives us the best glimpse into the future, so I use rankings from the previous seasons to get an idea of how good any given team can expect to be in the next season. Teams are then given a weight that coincides with their past performance, and these weights are applied when going through each team’s schedule.

I then add or subtract additional weights based on where and when the game is being played. Road games are more difficult than home games, for example, and  playing a Thursday night game after playing the previous Saturday adds a degree of difficulty. Playing eight straight weeks without a bye does, too.

After inputting all of this information, a number is produced that shows a team’s projected strength of schedule. One thing to keep in mind before you go through these rankings is that the best teams in a conference are at somewhat of a disadvantage compared to their conference mates as they do not get to play themselves. That naturally hinders its SOS against the other programs in the conference that do face it. Conversely, the worst team doesn’t play itself, and that impacts the floor of its SOS projection.

What do the scores mean? The overall score is the team’s SOS compared to the average SOS of all 130 FBS teams. For example, 21.34% is better than average. A negative score indicates below average. Colorado (39.19%) will enter 2020 with the toughest projected schedule among Power Five teams, while Syracuse (-6.40%) will have the easiest. The conference score is the same principle, but it is strictly in relation to the average score of the schedules within that team’s conference.

Here’s how things shook out in the ACC.

Strength of Schedule Rankings





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *